The Prospective Legal Challenges in International Environmental Dispute Resolution


Abstract views: 1 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • Md. Alamgir Hossen LL.M, MSS(VRJ) University of Dhaka Dhaka, Bangladesh.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14960019

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Legal Challenges, International Cooperation, Environmental Governance, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Environmental issues global scale and complexity are posing growing legal challenges for international dispute resolution mechanisms. The lack of enforceable legal frameworks and voluntary commitments under treaties like the Paris Agreement may hinder effective dispute resolution. Future challenges include the need for technological and scientific expertise in assessing environmental harm and addressing the disproportionate impact of degradation on vulnerable states and populations. International environmental disputes are becoming increasingly complex as the world grapples with climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, and resource depletion. Traditional dispute resolution mechanisms, such as treaties, arbitration, and multilateral agreements, have been instrumental in managing conflicts. However, these mechanisms face several prospective legal challenges that are likely to intensify in the future. Additionally, the evolving nature of environmental issues, such as climate change attribution and emerging pollutants, compounds the legal uncertainty. International bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and newer frameworks like the Paris Agreement provide avenues for dispute resolution but may struggle to keep pace with evolving scientific and legal norms. This paper explores these future challenges and proposes potential reforms, focusing on enhancing accountability, improving dispute resolution mechanisms, and aligning international legal frameworks with global environmental goals.

References

Misra, S. (2022). Environmental Conflict Resolution: ADR Strategies for Sustainable Solutions. ADR Strategies: Navigating Conflict Resolution in the Modern Legal World, 111.

Buchan, R., Franchini, D., & Tsagourias, N. (Eds.). (2023). The Changing Character of International Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Prospects.

Elborough, L. (2017). International climate change litigation: Limitations and possibilities for international adjudication and arbitration in addressing the challenge of climate change. NZJ Envtl. L., 21, 89.

Onyeabor, E. U., & Nwafor, I. E. (2022). Resolution of Environmental Disputes in Nigeria: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism. IRLJ, 4, 50.

Ngombane, S. O. (2018). Alternative dispute resolution: a mechanism for resolving enviromental disputes in South Africa.

Godsfriend, C. S. (2020). Comparing Environmental Dispute Management Compliance Mechanisms in International Environmental Treaties and Traditional Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Search for Effective Implementation. SOAS LJ, 7, 74.

Bruce, S. (2017). The Project for an International Environmental Court. In Conciliation in International Law (pp. 133-170). Brill Nijhoff.

Preston, B. J., & Butler, K. (2024). Appropriate dispute resolution of investor–state disputes in natural resources, energy and environmental cases. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 1-35.

Alvarez, G. M. (2020). The future of dispute resolution in the energy and natural resources sector: Setting the scene and looking ahead. In Routledge Handbook of Energy Law (pp. 579-597). Routledge.

Martin, A. T. (2011). Dispute resolution in the international energy sector: an overview. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 4(4), 332-368.

Shelton, D. (2021). International environmental law (Vol. 4). Brill.

Sidaway, R. (2013). Resolving environmental disputes: From conflict to consensus. Routledge.

Ramos, D. C. B. (2022). Environmental Dispute Resolution in Brazil: New Paths and Lessons from the US Legal Experience. Cardozo J. Conflict Resol., 24, 63.

Kalas, P. R., & Herwig, A. (2000). Dispute resolution under the Kyoto Protocol. Ecology law quarterly, 53-134.

Cooper, C. A. (1987). The Management of International Environmental Disputes in the Context of Canada-United States Relations: A Survey and Evaluation of Techniques and Mechanisms. Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international, 24, 247-313.

Chowdury, D.S.R.H., 2024. Harmony Amidst Diversity: Exploring Religious Pluralism in Bengal Through the Lens of Sufi Heritage and Its Envoys. Hamdard Islamicus, 47(4).

George, N. N., Victor, K. C., Gloria, K. C., Joshua, K., Hamisi, A. S., Solomon, G. N., ... & James, N. (2024). Environmental Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

Clark, E. (1995). The role of non litigious dispute resolution methods in environmental disputes. Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy, 2(2), 211-262.

Ye, Q. (2024). Functionalism and Law-making by Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in the International Law of the Sea (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Lancashire).

Ardhiyoko, A., Wiwoho, J., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2021, October). The Justice System in Indonesia with the Application of the Green Constitution in Mining Dispute Resolution. In International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy (ICEEP 2021) (pp. 234-237). Atlantis Press.

Angstadt, J. M. (2023). Can domestic environmental courts implement international environmental law? A framework for institutional analysis. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(2), 318-342.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-03

How to Cite

Hossen, M. A. (2025). The Prospective Legal Challenges in International Environmental Dispute Resolution. CenRaPS Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14960019

Issue

Section

Articles